Copyright (c) 2005-2006 Write2Pass. All Rights Reserved.
1. intentional torts: In torts,
causes of action are typically separated into two categories: negligent
torts and intentional torts. For intentional torts, be aware that
intent is a requisite element and must exist to prove a prima facie
case for the particular intentional tort.
2. intent: Examiners
will rarely expressly identify intent in the fact question. As a result,
applicants must be able to examine the facts to determine whether
intent exists. What are other ways that intent can be established?
3. prima facie elements: To establish a prima facie case, applicants
must examine each of the prima facie elements and determine whether
each exists. Each element must exist to establish a prima facie case.
4. facts: Remember that all facts in an essay question are important.
Examine the facts closely to determine how those facts can be incorporated
in the response. For instance, what’s the significance of the six-foot
privacy fence? Why did the examiners make the fence this tall? Why
did the examiners make it a privacy fence rather than a picket fence?
Examine the facts closely to determine how they can support arguments
or conclusions.
5. other claims: Many students on the question
either did not address other potential causes of action (as directed
by the call of the question) or failed to thoroughly examine the other
potential claims. Even though the cause of action was not expressly
given to you as opposed to assault, trespass to land, and conversion,
your discussion should still be detailed and complete.
This page has been created by Tommy Sangchompuphen for the benefit of students enrolled in the Winter 2006 administration of the BAR/BRI of Minnesota review course. Please direct all comments and questions regarding this site to Tommy Sangchompuphen at tommys@write2pass.com.